Compare · PrivIQ
Privacy360 vs PrivIQ partner programs for white-label privacy consultants
Independent DPOs and boutique consultancies choosing a platform to build a managed privacy service on are usually comparing two very different things: a partner program designed for white-label delivery, and a privacy compliance product that consultants can resell or administer on a client's behalf. Privacy360 runs an approval-gated white-label partner program with a branded partner shell above isolated client tenants. PrivIQ is publicly positioned as a practical privacy compliance and risk management platform; consultants commonly work inside client accounts or via reseller arrangements rather than through a published white-label tier structure. This page compares the two on the questions that decide the model you can actually sell.
Who this page is for
- ›Independent DPOs deciding which platform to build a productised service on
- ›Boutique consultancies that need every client workspace to carry their own brand
- ›Advisory firms weighing a partner program against a straightforward reseller arrangement
About Privacy360
Privacy360 is the privacy and AI governance platform operated by Privacy360 Limited and powered by Formiti Data International. It is a distinct product from similarly named offerings such as Centrl Privacy360 and 360 Privacy. Learn more on the Privacy360 by Formiti page.
Privacy360 · Partner Console — Managed Clients
●Your brand, isolated client tenants
- Client A — EU tenant · DSAR queue3 open
- Client B — UK tenant · ROPA reviewIn progress
- Client C — India tenant · AI registerCurrent
- Shadow session logAudited
The short answer
PrivIQ: PrivIQ tends to suit consultants who need a capable, easy-to-adopt privacy compliance tool for their clients and are comfortable delivering under the vendor's brand or negotiating reseller terms case by case.
Privacy360: The Privacy360 partner program suits consultancies that want a published tier structure, a white-label partner shell and client portal, isolated per-client tenants, audited impersonation and per-client data residency as standard.
The decision is rarely about privacy features. It is about whether the platform gives your practice a branded operating layer and a defined commercial program, or whether you are administering someone else's product in front of your clients.
How do the platforms compare, feature by feature?
| Partner consideration | Privacy360 partner program | PrivIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Program structure | Published, approval-gated partner program with three tiers and stated pricing | Consultant and reseller arrangements are not published as a tiered public program |
| White-label partner shell | Branded console above every client tenant with your logo and display name | Not a published capability of the public product positioning |
| White-label client portal | Clients see your brand across the workspace, not a third-party product | Clients typically experience the vendor's product branding |
| Client separation | Each client is an isolated tenant with its own RLS boundary and audit trail | Separate client accounts; partner-level cross-client console is not a published feature |
| Cross-client console | Single partner dashboard across the whole managed portfolio | Generally account-by-account access |
| Impersonation controls | Shadow sessions with mandatory reason, visible banner and immutable audit stamp | Not a publicly documented partner control |
| Data residency per client | EU, UK, US, India and APAC selectable per managed client | Hosting regions are described at product level rather than as a per-client partner choice |
| Multi-entity groups | Advanced entity management without flattening client isolation | Group structures supported within accounts |
| AI governance scope | AI system register, AI assessments and EU AI Act workflows in the same partner-managed platform | Not a primary public positioning theme |
| Module breadth for clients | ROPA, DSAR, breach, DPIA, LIA, TIA, vendor, consent, contract review, AI governance and training | Strong GDPR compliance coverage including DPIA, DSAR, breach, data mapping and reporting |
| Onboarding path | Apply, contract, automated tenant provisioning, then self-serve client onboarding (five business day review) | Commercial conversation with the vendor; no published onboarding SLA |
| Exit protection for end clients | Defined offboarding: clients are re-parented to Formiti with no service interruption | Handled contractually case by case |
Program structure
- Privacy360 partner program
- Published, approval-gated partner program with three tiers and stated pricing
- PrivIQ
- Consultant and reseller arrangements are not published as a tiered public program
White-label partner shell
- Privacy360 partner program
- Branded console above every client tenant with your logo and display name
- PrivIQ
- Not a published capability of the public product positioning
White-label client portal
- Privacy360 partner program
- Clients see your brand across the workspace, not a third-party product
- PrivIQ
- Clients typically experience the vendor's product branding
Client separation
- Privacy360 partner program
- Each client is an isolated tenant with its own RLS boundary and audit trail
- PrivIQ
- Separate client accounts; partner-level cross-client console is not a published feature
Cross-client console
- Privacy360 partner program
- Single partner dashboard across the whole managed portfolio
- PrivIQ
- Generally account-by-account access
Impersonation controls
- Privacy360 partner program
- Shadow sessions with mandatory reason, visible banner and immutable audit stamp
- PrivIQ
- Not a publicly documented partner control
Data residency per client
- Privacy360 partner program
- EU, UK, US, India and APAC selectable per managed client
- PrivIQ
- Hosting regions are described at product level rather than as a per-client partner choice
Multi-entity groups
- Privacy360 partner program
- Advanced entity management without flattening client isolation
- PrivIQ
- Group structures supported within accounts
AI governance scope
- Privacy360 partner program
- AI system register, AI assessments and EU AI Act workflows in the same partner-managed platform
- PrivIQ
- Not a primary public positioning theme
Module breadth for clients
- Privacy360 partner program
- ROPA, DSAR, breach, DPIA, LIA, TIA, vendor, consent, contract review, AI governance and training
- PrivIQ
- Strong GDPR compliance coverage including DPIA, DSAR, breach, data mapping and reporting
Onboarding path
- Privacy360 partner program
- Apply, contract, automated tenant provisioning, then self-serve client onboarding (five business day review)
- PrivIQ
- Commercial conversation with the vendor; no published onboarding SLA
Exit protection for end clients
- Privacy360 partner program
- Defined offboarding: clients are re-parented to Formiti with no service interruption
- PrivIQ
- Handled contractually case by case
Capability descriptions reflect typical product positioning. Competitor capabilities may vary by edition, configuration and contract.
Where does Privacy360 stand out?
Your brand, not ours
The partner shell and the client portal both carry your logo and display name, so the workspace reads as your practice's platform.
Isolation you can evidence
Every managed client sits in its own tenant with its own audit trail — the answer to the first question any client procurement team asks.
Audited impersonation
When you work inside a client workspace, the session is reason-coded, banner-visible and permanently stamped in the client's audit log.
Residency chosen per client
Pin each client to EU, UK, US, India or APAC rather than accepting one region for your whole portfolio.
Published tiers, no bespoke haggling
Starter, Professional and Enterprise pricing is on the page, so you can model your margin before you apply.
Privacy and AI governance together
Clients facing EU AI Act obligations can be served from the same platform your GDPR delivery already runs on.
When PrivIQ may be a better fit
- •You want a straightforward, quick-to-adopt privacy compliance tool and white-labelling is not commercially important to you.
- •Your clients are happy to hold their own vendor relationship and licence directly.
- •Your delivery is advisory-led and the platform is a supporting tool rather than the product you sell.
How to evaluate a white-label privacy partner program
Start with what your client sees on day one
The single biggest difference between a partner program and a reseller arrangement is whose brand appears when the client logs in. If your practice is selling a managed privacy service, a third-party product name in the interface undermines the position you are charging for. Privacy360 applies your logo and display name to both the partner console and the client workspace. Confirm this on any platform you assess — 'partner discount' and 'white-label' are frequently used interchangeably and mean very different things commercially.
Then check isolation and the audit trail
Client procurement will ask how their data is separated from your other clients, and how you access it. Look for per-client tenancy with its own access boundary, and look specifically at what happens when you as the consultant enter a client workspace. Privacy360 requires a reason for impersonation, shows a persistent banner during the session and writes an immutable record into the client's own audit log — which is what turns a difficult procurement question into a short answer.
Residency is a per-client decision, not a platform default
A UK consultancy with a German manufacturer, an Indian BPO and a US SaaS client cannot serve all three from one region. Ask whether residency is selected per managed client or fixed for your whole account. Privacy360 supports EU, UK, US, India and APAC selection per client tenant.
Model the margin before you commit
Published tiers let you calculate cost per managed client and set your own retainer against it. The Privacy360 tiers run from Starter (up to five managed clients) through Professional (up to ten, with advanced entity management and priority support) to Enterprise for portfolios of twenty or more. Where a vendor negotiates every partner deal individually, build in the time and uncertainty of that negotiation.
Ask what happens if the relationship ends
End clients care about continuity more than they care about your platform choice. A defined offboarding path — where clients are re-parented to the platform governor rather than stranded — is a reasonable thing to require in writing. It also makes the program easier for your clients' legal teams to approve.
Frequently asked questions
Explore Privacy360
Last reviewed: . We review comparison content periodically because vendor positioning evolves.